Mohamed Safwat vs Christian Lindell Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W W L
Form
L L L L L L W L L LH2H: Safwat 1 - 0 Lindell
They have played 2 sets in total, with Safwat winning 2 and Lindell winning 0. The last match between Safwat and Lindell was at the Italy F25 (Cornaiano), 11-08-2017, Semifinals, Clay with Mohamed Safwat getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mohamed Safwat | 1 |
| Christian Lindell | 0 |
| Safwat | Stats | Lindell |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 514 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 130 | Highest Rank | 177 |
| 34 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 31 | Titles | 13 |
| 59% (625-430) | Career Total W/L | 59% (442-303) |
| $262,205 | Career Prize Money | $68,305 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Christian Lindell
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:46:0 | Average Match Time | 1:46:0 |
| 63% (40/64) | 1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) |
| 85% (34/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (30/38) |
| 71% (17/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (17/60) | Return Points Win % | 20% (13/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mohamed Safwat vs Christian Lindell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Safwat 1 - 0 Lindell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Safwat has won 41.93% of points on their second serve, while Lindell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Safwat, in recent form, has won 46.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lindell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Safwat has saved 53.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lindell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Safwat has won 59.62% of matches played (W/L 31/ 21), with Lindell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Safwat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 301/ 162), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36). Lindell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 415/ 271), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Safwat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 23/ 12), where as Lindell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Safwat winning 1 times and Lindell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Safwat winning 2 and Lindell winning 0. The last match between Safwat and Lindell was at the Italy F25 (Cornaiano), 11-08-2017, Semifinals, Clay with Mohamed Safwat getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Safwat and Lindell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Safwat winning 0 times and Lindell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Safwat winning 1, and Lindell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Safwat has played against opponents with an average rank of 406.42 while Lindell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Safwat has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lindell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Safwat has converted 29.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lindell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mohamed Safwat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Mohamed Safwat
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 6-7(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Oscar Moraing
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Leonardo Cattaneo
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Niklas Waldner
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Mohamed Safwat
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carles Cordoba
Player
Mohamed Safwat
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
47 of
103)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mohamed Safwat
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Lindell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Christian Lindell
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Christian Lindell
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Patrik Rikl
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Christian Lindell
41%
(
46 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
34 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christian Lindell
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Safwat vs Lindell?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Safwat Vs Lindell is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (625/430) | Win/Loss | 59% (442/303) |
| 57% (1378/1033) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (973/720) |
| 53% (11939/10766) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8362/7537) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2511 | Aces Total | 1574 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1600 | Total Double Faults | 1283 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 551.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 599.01 |
| 59% (25470/42883) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17697/29405) |
| 71% (17995/25470) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12009/17697) |
| 51% (8819/17405) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5578/11712) |
| 41% (1636/4013) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1312/3093) |
| 38% (16596/43546) | Return Points Win % | 41% (12005/29485) |
| 60% (612/1028) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (425/719) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 50% (156/314) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (108/202) |
| 56% (161/290) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (115/217) |
| 88% (609/538) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (430/382) |
| 12% (609/71) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (430/47) |
| 20% (446/87) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (315/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
